🧠 Introduction
AiDetector.com is an AI detection tool with a strong domain name, a clean interface, and claims of fast, reliable detection. It advertises support for more than 145 languages and promotes itself as a free alternative to larger AI detection platforms.
To evaluate how well it actually performs, we tested human text, AI text, mixed samples, and TwainGPT humanized content. We also reviewed its speed, user experience, and overall reliability.
💰 Pricing
AiDetector.com is completely free.
There are no credits, limits, or pricing pages. Anyone can use the detector instantly.
This makes the tool accessible and easy to try.
🧪 AI Detection Results
We ran several tests in English using human text, AI text, mixed content, and humanized AI text.
Here are the results:
| Text Type | Result |
|---|---|
| AI Text | 27% AI |
| Human Text | 35% AI |
| Mixed (50/50) | 33% AI |
| TwainGPT Humanized | 25% AI |
Across all tests, every score fell between 20–39% AI, regardless of the text we submitted. This raises questions about the tool’s reliability and suggests there may not be much real analysis happening behind the scenes.
🐌 Speed and Performance
AiDetector.com claims an average scan time of 4.8 seconds, but our testing showed the opposite:
- Texts under 200 words often took 15 to 20 seconds
- Processing speed changed from test to test
- Slowdowns were common
💻 User Experience
The interface at AiDetector.com is clean, simple, and easy to use. Inputting text is straightforward, and the design is better than many other free detectors.
However, the slow performance and nearly identical scores across all text types greatly limit its usefulness.
🌍 SEO and Domain Strength
AiDetector.com has one of the strongest domain names in the AI detection industry. The exact-match phrase “ai detector” is highly valuable and desirable.
Despite owning such a premium domain, the site does not rank on the first page of Google. Larger competitors like GPTZero, ZeroGPT, QuillBot, and Grammarly dominate the top search results.
The domain itself is likely worth a large amount due to its relevance and simplicity.
🧬 Language Support
AiDetector.com claims support for 145+ languages.
Our testing focused on English, and while the tool does generate results, the scores were so similar across all inputs that it is difficult to meaningfully assess its accuracy.
📊 Scorecard
| Feature | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detector | ⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) | Unreliable and inconsistent. |
| UI & UX | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Simple, clean interface. |
| Transparency | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | Claims do not match use. |
| Value | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Free but inaccurate. |
Overall Rating: ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5)
✅ Final Verdict
We do not recommend AiDetector.com.
AiDetector.com is easy to use, completely free, and has a clean interface. However, during testing, the AI scores were nearly identical across human text, AI text, mixed content, and humanized content. This makes it difficult to rely on for accurate AI detection.
- ✔ Free and simple
- ✔ Clean UI
- ❌ Slow scans
- ❌ Inaccurate results
If you want to humanize AI content and bypass AI checkers, use TwainGPT.