🧠 Introduction
Quetext began as one of the most popular plagiarism checkers on the web. Over time, it has expanded into AI detection, offering educators, writers, and students a complete content integrity suite.
In this review, we tested Quetext’s AI Detector for accuracy, reliability, and overall experience. We also explored how well TwainGPT can bypass its AI detection system.
💡 Product Overview
Quetext uses its proprietary DeepSearch™ technology to identify both plagiarism and AI-generated writing.
The platform combines multiple tools in one interface:
- AI Detector
- Plagiarism Checker
- Citation Generator
- AI Tutor and Grammar Checker (on paid plans)
The free version includes up to 2,000 words for AI detection and 500 words for plagiarism checks.
💰 Pricing & Plans
| Plan | Monthly Cost | AI Detection Limit | Plagiarism Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 2,000 words | 500 words |
| Essential | $14.99/month | 100,000 words | Grammar, spell check, and AI Tutor |
| Professional | $29.98/month | 200,000 words | Bulk uploads, remarks tool, and team features |
Note: Annual plans are 45% off
Overall, the pricing is fair compared to other AI detection and plagiarism platforms, and the free plan is generous for casual users.
🧪 AI Detector Accuracy
We tested Quetext on multiple writing samples to evaluate consistency and precision.
| Text Type | AI Probability |
|---|---|
| Human Text | 0% AI |
| AI Text (ChatGPT) | 99% AI |
| Mixed Text (50/50) | 16% AI |
| TwainGPT Humanized | 0% AI |
✅ The AI detector is accurate overall, correctly identifying AI-generated content without flagging human writing.
⚠️ It slightly underestimated mixed text, but that is better than overestimating and causing false positives.
🔍 Plagiarism Checker
The plagiarism checker is reliable and functional. It identifies copied or near-duplicate content from web sources.
Although testing was limited, early results suggest that it performs as expected for plagiarism detection.
💻 User Experience
The Quetext interface feels outdated, especially compared to modern tools like TwainGPT, GPTZero, or Copyleaks.
During sign-up, we encountered repeated IP and email blocking errors, even when using verified and legitimate accounts. This was frustrating and may prevent new users from getting started easily.
Once inside, however, the system runs smoothly and delivers results quickly. Reports are clearly formatted and easy to interpret.
📊 Scorecard
| Feature | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detector | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Reliable and accurate results. |
| Plagiarism Checker | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Works as intended, consistent performance. |
| UI & UX | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | Outdated design and buggy sign-up. |
| Transparency | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Limited technical details but clear reports. |
| Value | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Fair pricing and a strong free plan. |
Overall Rating: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
✅ Final Verdict
Quetext offers a reliable AI detector and plagiarism checker that perform well for most users.
The AI detector is conservative and accurate, successfully identifying AI-generated content while avoiding false positives. The plagiarism checker also works as expected.
The main drawbacks are the outdated interface and sign-up friction, which can make onboarding difficult for some users.
- ✅ Detects AI text accurately
- ✅ Includes a plagiarism checker
- ⚠️ Underestimates mixed content
- ⚠️ Outdated UI and account setup issues
If you want to humanize your AI text and bypass Quetext’s AI Detector, use TwainGPT.