🧠 Introduction
Reilaa positions itself as an AI detection and academic integrity platform, offering AI detection and paid Turnitin scans.
Recently, Reilaa has gained visibility as more students search for ways to check their work before submission. However, unlike dedicated AI detection tools, Reilaa’s core offering appears to rely heavily on paid Turnitin scans, which places it in a legally and operationally gray area.
To evaluate whether Reilaa’s AI detector is worth using, we tested it across AI-written text, human-written text, mixed content, and humanized text, and reviewed user feedback.
🧪 Testing Reilaa’s AI Detector
Reilaa provides a free AI detection estimate, clearly stating that this free model is only about 50% accurate. While this transparency is appreciated, accuracy still matters in practice.
Below are the results from our testing.
Accuracy Test Results
| Text Type | Reilaa Result |
|---|---|
| AI Text | 28% AI |
| Human Text | 0% AI |
| Mixed Text | 0% AI |
| Humanized Text | 0% AI |
❗ Key Findings
1. Fails to Detect AI Reliably
Fully AI-generated text scored only 28% AI, which is far below acceptable standards for an AI detector.
2. Mixed Content Not Detected at All
Mixed AI and human writing scored 0% AI, indicating no meaningful detection capability for mixed content.
3. Human Text Scores Are Not Meaningful
While human and humanized text scoring 0% AI may look positive, this result is unreliable when the detector also fails to identify actual AI writing.
Overall, Reilaa’s AI detector does not perform at a level comparable to major AI detection tools.
🎨 User Interface
Reilaa’s interface is clean and modern. Uploading text is straightforward, and results are presented clearly.
That said, a polished UI does not compensate for a weak AI detector. The detector’s simplicity reflects its limited underlying capability.
🗣️ User Reviews and Community Feedback
Public user feedback on Reilaa is overwhelmingly negative, with consistent complaints about false positives, broken uploads, and inconsistent results.
Below are some reviews from users.
User Reviews
Gawubit (⭐☆☆☆☆)
Flagging my own original writing as 100% AI-generated.
Ravitam (⭐☆☆☆☆)
This AI detector is completely fraudulent.
Sinam (⭐☆☆☆☆)
Tool doesn't work. I could only upload a txt file. After uploading my file, the tool did not work. I waited half an hour and nothing happened.
Mayunira (⭐☆☆☆☆)
Since I don’t use AI, this tool did not work.
Vakocc (⭐☆☆☆☆)
The results are wildly inconsistent.
Jungen (⭐☆☆☆☆)
Waste of money.
James (⭐☆☆☆☆)
Not unlimited. Scam.
Stipplen (⭐☆☆☆☆)
It flagged my thesis written in 1997.
Guiel (⭐☆☆☆☆)
This "unlimited" detector tool called my work AI-generated.
Review Pattern
Across reviews, the same problems appear repeatedly:
- Human writing flagged as AI
- Inconsistent and contradictory scores
- Uploads failing or never completing
- Dissatisfaction with value and accuracy
💰 Pricing
Reilaa offers one-time purchases rather than subscriptions, with pricing centered around paid Turnitin reports.
Pricing Breakdown
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Single | $3.99 | 1 report with AI detection + similarity analysis |
| Starter | $9.99 | 3 reports ($3.33 per report) |
| Value | $29.99 | 10 reports ($3.00 per report) |
Each report claims to include:
- AI detection and similarity analysis
- No repository storage (no trace)
- Results in 2–5 minutes
- Credits that never expire
Pricing Concerns
While the per-report pricing may seem reasonable, the value depends entirely on whether the reports truly reflect official Turnitin results.
Since Turnitin does not authorize third-party access, services using this model often face downtime, failed scans, or enforcement issues, as seen with similar platforms.
⚖️ Comparison to Turnitin-Based Services
Reilaa’s reliance on paid Turnitin scans places it in the same category as platforms like Academi.cx, which we previously reviewed.
In our Academi.cx review, we found that while Turnitin-based scrapers can be accurate when working, they often suffer from:
- Frequent downtime
- Failed uploads
- Legal enforcement from Turnitin
- Inconsistent availability
Reilaa appears to follow a similar model, which carries the same risks.
📊 Scorecard
| Category | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | ⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) | Unreliable AI detection results. |
| Reliability | ⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) | Reviews report inconsistent performance. |
| Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Clean interface and simple workflow. |
| Value | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Has value if Turnitin reports work as advertised. |
Overall Rating: ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5)
❌ Final Verdict
Reilaa’s AI detector is not reliable.
In testing, Reilaa’s AI detector failed to accurately identify AI-generated text and misclassified mixed content. This makes it unsuitable for academic or professional AI detection use.
While the platform may still have value through its Turnitin scans, Reilaa's free AI detector itself is not reliable.
👉 To bypass Reilaa’s AI detector and Turnitin, use TwainGPT.
📌 FAQ
Is Reilaa’s AI detector accurate?
No, it fails to reliably detect AI-written or mixed content.
Is Reilaa's free detector reliable?
No, Reilaa states it is only about 50% accurate.
Is Reilaa a legitimate company?
Yes, but its AI detector is unreliable and its business model raises concerns.