🧠 Introduction
Rewritify markets itself as a premium AI humanizer and detection tool that can make AI-generated text “undetectable.” It promises the ability to bypass GPTZero, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, and more.
The platform has a modern, dark-themed interface and looks polished at first glance. But performance matters far more than presentation.
This review covers real humanizer test results, pricing, limitations, and whether Rewritify is actually worth using.
💰 Pricing
Rewritify offers three subscription tiers:
Rewritify Pricing Overview
| Plan | Price | Words per Month | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | $14/month | 5,000 words | Humanizer, AI detector, 30+ languages |
| Ultimate | $24/month | 50,000 words | Same features with higher limits |
| Unlimited | $49/month | Unlimited words | All features with no limits |
Each plan includes:
- Humanizer
- AI detector
- Multiple bypass modes
- 30+ languages
- “Undetectable AI writing”
🧪 AI Humanizer Test
We humanized a standard AI-generated sample using Rewritify and then tested the rewritten output against several AI detectors.
Humanizer Results
| Detector | Result |
|---|---|
| GPTZero | 100% AI |
| ZeroGPT | 84% AI |
| Quillbot | 100% AI |
| Copyleaks | 100% AI |
Rewritify failed to bypass every AI detector.
🔍 Rewritify AI Detector Results
Rewritify includes its own AI detector, which aggregates results from multiple third-party detectors.
1. AI-Generated Text (Incorrect Results)
The following table shows Rewritify’s reported results for AI-generated text:
| Detector | Rewritify’s Output |
|---|---|
| GPTZero | Possibly AI-generated |
| Copyleaks | AI-generated |
| ZeroGPT | AI-generated |
| Crossplag | Possibly AI-generated |
| Sapling | Human-written |
| Writer | AI-generated |
| BrandWell | Human-written |
Rewritify incorrectly reported two detectors as “Human-written” even though the text was AI and all major detectors flagged it correctly.
2. Human-Written Text (Accurate)
On the other hand, Rewritify did correctly classify human-written text:
| Detector | Rewritify’s Output |
|---|---|
| GPTZero | Human-written |
| Copyleaks | Human-written |
| ZeroGPT | Human-written |
| Crossplag | Human-written |
| Sapling | Human-written |
| Writer | Human-written |
| BrandWell | Human-written |
Summary
- Works well for human-written text
- Frequently misclassifies AI-written text
📉 Limitations
Rewritify has several notable weaknesses:
- Humanizer fails to bypass major AI detectors
- AI detector mislabels some AI text as human
- Higher pricing compared to competing tools, despite inconsistent performance
These issues significantly reduce the overall value of the platform.
💻 UI and UX
Rewritify’s interface is one of its stronger points:
- Clean dark UI
- Organized layout
- Fast processing
- Simple, straightforward workflow
📊 Scorecard
| Category | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Humanizer | ⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) | Failed to bypass major AI detectors. |
| AI Detector | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Correct on human text but misclassified AI text. |
| UI & UX | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Clean, modern, and smooth to use. |
| Value | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | High pricing for the performance provided. |
Overall Rating: ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5)
❌ Final Verdict
We do not recommend Rewritify.
The platform looks professional, but the humanizer performed poorly and the AI detector misclassified multiple AI samples as human. When combined with the higher pricing and strong marketing claims, Rewritify does not deliver the level of reliability most users need.
If you want a reliable and consistent AI humanizer, use TwainGPT.