🧠 Introduction
Smodin is an AI-powered writing platform offering tools for detection, rewriting, and academic support. The company claims to serve over 10 million users with features like an AI Detector, Humanizer, and Plagiarism Checker.
In this review, we tested both the AI Detector and Humanizer to evaluate accuracy, usability, and overall reliability.
💡 Product Overview
Smodin provides a wide set of AI writing tools, including:
- AI Detector
- AI Humanizer
- Rewrite & AI Writing Tools
- Plagiarism Checker
- AI Chat, Homework, and Grader
The platform focuses on academic and professional writing, offering everything from essay grading to AI text rewriting in one place.
🧪 AI Detector
We tested Smodin’s AI Detector using human, AI-generated, mixed, Smodin-humanized, and TwainGPT-humanized text samples.
| Text Type | Detection Result |
|---|---|
| AI Text (ChatGPT) | 100% AI |
| Mixed Text (50/50) | 100% AI |
| Human Text (Sample 1) | 50% AI |
| Human Text (Sample 2) | 78% AI |
| Smodin Humanized | 62% AI |
| TwainGPT Humanized | 0% AI |
The detector frequently overestimated AI content, incorrectly flagging human and mixed text as AI.
It also failed to accurately assess its own humanized output.
Overall, Smodin’s AI detector is unreliable, producing false positives on human writing and inconsistent results across multiple tests.
🧍 AI Humanizer
We tested Smodin’s AI Humanizer across multiple detectors to measure how well it could make AI text undetectable.
| Detector | Detection Result |
|---|---|
| GPTZero | 100% AI |
| ZeroGPT | 100% AI |
| Turnitin | 100% AI |
| Copyleaks | 100% AI |
| QuillBot | 100% AI |
| Smodin | 62% AI |
Smodin’s Humanizer failed to bypass every major AI detector and only partially reduced the AI probability on its own detector.
This makes it unsuitable for users looking to make AI-generated text undetectable.
💻 User Experience
The interface is modern, clean, and easy to navigate. Switching between the AI Detector, Humanizer, and Rewriter tools is smooth and intuitive.
That said, the platform’s reliability does not match its visual quality. While it looks professional, the performance and detection accuracy remain inconsistent, which limits its overall usefulness.
📊 Scorecard
| Feature | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detector | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | Unreliable results and frequent false positives. |
| AI Humanizer | ⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) | Failed to bypass major AI detectors. |
| UI & UX | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Modern design and easy to navigate. |
| Transparency | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | Clear claims but poor consistency in performance. |
| Value | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5) | Limited reliability despite broad tool offerings. |
Overall Rating: ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2/5)
✅ Final Verdict
We do not recommend Smodin’s AI Detector or Humanizer.
Smodin provides a modern interface and a variety of writing tools, but its AI Detector and AI Humanizer are unreliable.
The detector frequently produces false positives, and the humanizer fails to make AI text undetectable across major detectors.
- ⚠️ Unreliable AI detection
- ⚠️ Humanizer fails to bypass AI detectors
- ✅ Clean, user-friendly interface
- ✅ Broad feature set
If you want to bypass AI detectors, use TwainGPT.